Showing posts with label white supremacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label white supremacy. Show all posts

Sunday, March 10, 2024

White Supremacy in the Virginia Court of Appeals

Va. Appellate Court Justices Protect known White Supremist Judge Daniel T. Balfour


A complaint filed with the VGA exposes retired Judge Daniel T. Balfour as having close ties with Neo-Confederate organizations that have strong white supremist beliefs and that their heritage of pro-slavery should be preserved. Article on Complaint filed with VGA

The fact is that Virginia Appellate Justices Daniel Ortiz, Lisa Lorish, and Richard AtLee recognized that Daniel T. Balfour has strong ties to white supremist organizations and funds them by selling his book "13th Virginia Cavalry." Appellate Justices Daniel Ortiz, Lisa Lorish, and Richard AtLee, ignored the evidence in CAV Rec. No. 0706-22 that retired Judge Balfour committed treason by usurping the authority of the SCV and VGA. See Article on Bribery of Appellate judges

Daniel T. Balfour has been a judge for over twenty (20) years, eight (8) years as a presiding judge in Henrico County Circuit Court and twelve (12) years as a retired judge who is on recall. The SCV can recall retired judges, only by a designation order, to preside over cases where presiding judges in that judicial circuit have recused themselves or if the court is overloaded.

The most disturbing fact is that a known racist Judge (Balfour) has been presiding over circuit court cases in the City of Richmond for over twelve (12) years which has a population of 44% blacks and presided in the Henrico County for eight (8) years where the population of blacks is 29.6%.

The "13th Virginia Cavalry" was written in 1986 by Daniel T. Balfour which depicts Judge Balfour's ancestors fight to retain the rights to own and enslave African Americans. Judge Balfour "13th Virginia Cavalry" promotes and supports the heritage of pro-slavery and funds white supremist organizations that continue to recruit families and individuals to their events.





Daniel T. Balfour is a current member of the "13th Virginia Cavalry" Company I, Board Member of the Museum of the Confederacy and a member of the Sons of Confederate Veterans.

The "13th Virginia Cavalry" Company I, is a white supremist organization which that continues to promote PRO-SLAVERY views and lifestyles to individuals and families through events in this current time of awareness.

13th Virginia Cavalry" Company I promotional flyer

The recruitment flyer states "The Company seeks to recreate Civil War-era battle tactics and emulate Civil War camp life. Company I, 13th Virginia Infantry Regiment is highly respected in the reenactment community. It is a family oriented unit based in South Central Pennsylvania with members from Virginia, West Virginia, and Maryland. From living history to battle reenactments, the 13th Virginia takes the field today to preserve the historic record of the War of the Rebellion and to help educate those who come to witness what we do. Don’t wait, Join now to be a member of the best Confederate reenactment unit anywhere.”

13th Virginia Cavalry Company I flag

Daniel T. Balfour's 13th Virginia Cavalry dedication page uses the same phrases as the promotional flyer used to organize events and recruit new members to their white supremacy Confederate community.

Sunday, January 22, 2023

Chapter 1. EVIDENCE OF MCGUIREWOODS SHADOW GOVERNMENT IN VIRGINIA COURTS

 Judges' Orders Further Exposes the McGuireWoods Shadow Government Corruption

January 22, 2023. Author- Brace Impact



     After 14 months, decisions were issued concerning four complaints filed in the Henrico County Circuit Court against 10 high-profile attorneys consisting of judges, prosecutors, and high profile attorneys including Richard Cullen, the Chief Legal Advisor for Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin.

    As alleged in the complaints filed, Judge Joseph Ellis's Memorandum Opinion and Order issued on January 13, 2023, gave further evidence that McGuireWoods Shadow Government, headed by Richard Cullen, controls the Judicial system in the Virginia Courts. No matter the crimes committed by Virginia Shadow Government lawyers and the legal arguments presented by Plaintiffs, the judges will disregard the U.S. Constitution and Rules of Court and always rule in favor of McGuireWoods Shadow Government.

    The highly controversial case forced the recusal of five Henrico County Circuit Court judges and three other judges designated by the Virginia Supreme Court.  Judge Wilford Taylor had recused himself after evidence filed in the cases proved he had ex parte communications with third parties which he reversed a previous order allowing Spanos to give testimony by two-way audio-video communications. Judge Joseph Ellis denied Spanos's Motions to appear by two-way audio-video and give testimony.


     The defendants listed in the ethics complaints are:
  • Richard Cullen
  • James B. Comey
  • Howard Vick
  • Judge Lee A. Harris
  • Shannon Taylor
  • Michael Feinmel
  • Heidi Barshinger
  • George Manoli Loupassi
  • Wade Kizer
  • Todd Stone
  • William Birch Douglass III
  • William Hutchins
    

    The Defendants filed Demurrers and Pleas of Immunity stating that their unethical misconduct and crimes were protected by judicial and prosecutorial immunity. The Defendants did not deny the allegations of bribery, obstruction of justice, destroying evidence, forgery and several constitutional violations in the complaints.  
     
     Evidence filed in the complaints depicted that McGuireWoods law firm operates the Virginia Shadow Government, headed by Richard Cullen, which controls the three branches, Judicial, Legislative, and Executive, of the Commonwealth of Virginia. The complaints further stated that McGuireWoods law firm has infiltrated the DOJ and FBI by placing McGuireWoods attorneys in key positions and controlling the manner of which the FBI and DOJ is operated.
    
     The complaints gave hundreds of pages of evidence that the 10 high profile attorneys promoted and supported a "white nationalism doctrine" which gave special legal treatment and protection to over 30 white affluent professionals consisting of lawyers, doctors and businessmen who were involved in a 600 kilo cocaine organization that operated in the Richmond area for over 10 years. Many of the white affluent professionals were clients of McGuireWoods law firm and connected to Richard Cullen. 

    The complaints filed by Nickolas Spanos, who had been accused of being the "hub" of the 600-kilo cocaine organization, gave evidence of bribery, political favors, and a criminal syndicate that operated in the Henrico County Circuit Court. Spanos who has been protected by the Henrico Commonwealth Attorney's office and kept in exile, so that he could not testify against the affluent white professionals who were involved in the 600-kilo cocaine organization. Despite having 13 indictments for the distribution of cocaine, the Henrico Commonwealth Attorney's office has refused to extradite Spanos to Henrico County.

    The complaints gave evidence, which included FBI reports and court documents that Richard Cullen obstructed justice and bribed Henrico Commonwealth Attorneys to protect Spanos from being arrested and extradited to Henrico County to face the 13 indictments for distribution of cocaine amounting to 600 kilos. Court documents stated that Cullen, managing partner for McGuireWoods law firm, did not want Spanos prosecuted for the 13 indictments as it would lead to Spanos testifying against the affluent white professionals who were attorneys employed by McGuireWoods or clients of McGuireWoods.

     Spanos and his family were clients of McGuireWoods, under Richard Cullen's management, with estate holdings in the millions of dollars. Richard Cullen bribed Henrico County Commonwealth Attorney Howard Vick with a partners position with McGuireWoods law firm in exchange for his refusal to file an extradition request for Spanos while he was in Greece. The USA and Greece have had an extradition treaty since 1937 and Spanos had no protection from being extradited.

    On January 13, 2023, Judge Joseph Ellis issued orders for:
Case No. CL21005758 Spanos v. Vick, 
Case No. CL21005759 Spanos v. Douglass et al., 
Case No. CL21006572 Spanos v. Vick et al.
Case No. CL22002250 Spanos v. Harris et al.

   The orders dismissed Spanos's complaints stating that Spanos did not have standing and the Court did not have jurisdiction to discipline attorneys accused of violating the Rules of the Virginia Code of Professional Conduct (VCPC).

    Spanos gave evidence that Virginia Codes, Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, Virginia Supreme Court and United States Supreme Court cases and the Virginia State Bar dictated that only Virginia Courts have the authority and jurisdiction to discipline attorneys who violate the rules of the VCPC. Judge Joseph Ellis ignored the Virginia Legislature, Virginia Supreme Court rules, Virginia and U.S. Supreme Court opinions and Virginia State Bar letters which all supported Spanos's assertions that Virginia Courts have jurisdiction in attorney disciplinary hearings.

    Spanos filed motions for Judge Joseph Ellis to recuse himself because he violated the Virginia Judicial Canons by having a conflict of interest concerning the defendants, specifically Richard Cullen and other McGuireWoods defendants. Judge Joseph Ellis refused to address the motion to recuse himself and neglected to issue an order.

    Spanos also filed an Objection to a Pre-Filing Injunction submitted by McGuireWoods which sought to prohibit Spanos from filing ethics complaints in the entire Commonwealth of Virginia. Spanos based his objection that McGuireWoods attorneys violated Va. Code § 8.01-271.1. which contained signature defects and gave notice that they were required to be remedied within 21 days of notice by Spanos. McGuireWoods attorneys Brandon Santos, Garret Hooe, and Ellen Hubbard, had unethically signed the Pre-Filing Injunction without being authorized to represent the other 7 defendants who had their own counsel of record.

    Judge Joseph Ellis unethically neglected to rule on Spanos's Motions and issued his Memorandum Opinion and Order without addressing the two important motions filed by Spanos.

    Despite the dismissal of the ethics complaints, Judge Joseph Ellis' Memorandum Opinion and Order undeniably proves that Virginia Judges are controlled by McGuireWoods Shadow Government headed by Richard Cullen and despite the hundreds of pages of evidence proving that a criminal syndicate exists in the Henrico County Circuit Court which supported and promoted "white nationalism", Virginia's citizens are left unprotected and have no constitutional rights to file complaints in the Virginia Courts.

   

   

Thursday, December 30, 2021

Removing Statues is not going to Cure Virginia's Justice System's White Nationalism Problem

Good Ol' Boy Judges are the Problem with the Virginia Justice System 



        If the Virginia Justice System is to eliminate racism in the courts, good ol' boy Judges need to be eliminated. Since the era of slavery, Virginia Justice and good ol 'boy Judges go hand in hand, providing two justice systems, one for people of color/ethnic groups and another for white affluent professionals.

      Dictionary defines “white nationalism” as:

                     1: the belief, theory, or doctrine that white people are inherently superior to people from all other racial and ethnic groups, and that in order to preserve their white, European, and Christian cultural identities, they need or deserve a segregated geographical area, preferential treatment, and special legal protections.

      This is no secret, everyone in the Virginia justice system recognizes the two justice system exists and accepts it. No one speaks against it, except the victims who are primarily people of color. 

       The attorneys do not dare speak against the good ol' boy system because they will be targeted by the Virginia State Bar with their illegal disciplinary system, which can illegally revoke an attorney's license without due process of law. See article: Virginia State Bar Illegal Disciplinary System

How can a justice system be fair when Judges rule on cases based on anything but the Rule of Law and the U.S. Constitution. Good ol' boy Judges will rule on:
  • Who the law firm is- usually a large corporation or connected attorney close to the Judge.
  • Who the parties are- white professionals are given the good ol' boy privileges of case being decided in their favor.
  • What is the race of the attorney representing the client- again white attorneys are given the privilege of rulings in their favor.
      We need not mention that Virginia criminal convictions are primarily based on race and that that people of color are sentenced to far more time than Caucasians convictions.

      These good ol' boy Judges have been serving in the courts for decades and own the system. They rule as they please with no accountability because they know that the Appellate and Supreme Court Judges are also good ol' boys.

      Despite there being Virginia Judicial Canons for Judges, those rules do not apply to good ol' boys. These Judicial Canons only apply to judges who have committed serious criminal crimes.

      Honesty, integrity, and fairness no longer exists in the Virginia Courts. The only rule that applies is who you are. If you are a white affluent professional, you are protected and afforded special preferential treatment. If you are a person of color or belong to an ethnic group, you are segregated for a different unjust system which will hide exculpatory evidence, convict you and sentence you to the prison labor camps run by corporations.

     Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts chided federal judges for not recusing themselves from cases posing a conflict of interest. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/john-roberts-argues-judges-stay-out-cases-financial-conflict-interest?fr=operanews&fbclid=IwAR3AHYtwih2NhHlKmHs3gKTz4gC2GukHG7TlsePLv8tlf3mdwYiU-iAbyR0

      A recent article about "Robed in secrecy: How judges accused of misconduct can dodge public scrutiny". Virginia ranks amongst the lowest states for Judicial Discipline transparency.


      Complaints against corrupt judges are far and few, but a loophole in the law has given private citizens the right to file ethics complaints against corrupt lawyers and judges which bypass the Virginia State Bar and allows to file ethics complaints directly with Virginia Circuit courts. Don't expect any victories in the circuit courts, as the good ol' boys cover for each other.

      Want to make a change in this good ol' boy judges system? Write or call your delegates and senators, demand they eliminate Judicial Immunity and make the good ol' boys liable for their corruption.