Showing posts with label Judicial Immunity.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Judicial Immunity.. Show all posts

Thursday, November 24, 2022

Virginia Senators Continues to Reappoint Corrupt Judges

 Va. Senators Reappoints Corrupt Judge Despite Hard Evidence of Bribery and Political Gain



     Virginia's Judicial system is rotten with corruption, judges ignore their sworn oath to honor the Virginia Judicial Canons and violate the Rules of the Virginia Code of Professional Conduct. Virginia Senators are responsible for the appointment of Judges in Virginia for a six year term.

     In December 2021, the Virginia General Assembly received hundreds of pages of evidence exposing a criminal syndicate, headed by Judge Lee A. Harris Jr., operating in the Henrico County Circuit Court for over 24 years.


       Live testimony in a video provided to the Judicial sub-committee by a witness, who Judge Harris had protected in a 600-kilo cocaine organization, gave additional evidence of Henrico County Court documents being tampered by Judge Harris, Henrico Commonwealth Attorney Shannon Taylor and Deputy Commonwealth Attorney Michael Feinmel, The evidence showed that the three conspired to destroy hundreds of pages of exhibits of evidence to protect an international fugitive from being extradited to Henrico County and be prosecuted for thirteen indictments for distribution of cocaine.

      Judge Lee A. Harris Jr. obstructed justice in the 600-kilo cocaine case by issuing orders denying the transport of the 600-kilo cocaine fugitive from Greece to Henrico County as to stand trial for the thirteen indictments. Despite the Fugitive asking to be voluntarily extradited to Henrico County, Judge Harris refused to issue an order to provide transportation and escorted by U.S. Marshals.

       The Virginia Senate recognizing the evidence of corruption which included bribery, obstruction of justice, destroying evidence, and making false statements to the Court, the 2022 Virginia Senators voted unanimously to reappoint Judge Lee A. Harris to a six year term so that he would reach retirement status.

       It is evident that the only issue that Republicans and Democrats can unanimously agree on is to continue to keep the Virginia Justice system corrupt.

The Senators who voted 40-0 to reappoint Judge Lee Harris were:

                              DISTRICT      PARTY 

George L. Barker

39

                   Democrat

John J. Bell

13

                   Democrat

Jennifer B. Boysko

33

                   Democrat

Amanda F. Chase

11

                   Republican

John A. Cosgrove, Jr.

14

                   Republican

R. Creigh Deeds

25

                   Democrat

Bill DeSteph

8

                   Republican

Siobhan S. Dunnavant

12

                   Republican

Adam P. Ebbin

30

                   Democrat

John S. Edwards

21

                   Democrat

Barbara A. Favola

31

                   Democrat

T. Travis Hackworth

38

                   Republican

Emmett W. Hanger, Jr.

24

                   Republican

Ghazala F. Hashmi

10

                   Democrat

Janet D. Howell

32

                   Democrat

Jen A. Kiggans

7

                   Republican

Lynwood W. Lewis, Jr.

6

                   Democrat

Mamie E. Locke

2

                   Democrat

L. Louise Lucas

18

                   Democrat

David W. Marsden

37

                   Democrat

T. Montgomery "Monty" Mason

1

                   Democrat

Jennifer L. McClellan

9

                   Democrat

Ryan T. McDougle

4

                   Republican

Jeremy S. McPike

29

                   Democrat

Joseph D. Morrissey

16

                   Democrat

Stephen D. Newman

23

                   Republican

Thomas K. Norment, Jr.

3

                   Republican

Mark D. Obenshain

26

                   Republican

Mark J. Peake

22

                   Republican

J. Chapman Petersen

34

                    Democrat

Todd E. Pillion

40

                    Republican

Bryce E. Reeves

17

                    Republican

Frank M. Ruff, Jr.

15

                    Republican

Richard L. Saslaw

35

                    Democrat

Lionell Spruill, Sr.

5

                    Democrat

William M. Stanley, Jr.

20

                    Republican

Richard H. Stuart

28

                    Republican

David R. Suetterlein

19

                    Republican

Scott A. Surovell

36

                    Democrat

Jill Holtzman Vogel

27

                    Republican




Wednesday, November 3, 2021

Virginia State Bar has been illegally Disciplining Attorneys for 40 years

 Virginia Court Cases Filed Expose the Virginia State Bar's Illegal Discipline System for 40 years

Virginia Supreme Court Justice Donald W. Lemons


In the past few months, several Ethics Complaints have been filed in the Virginia Courts against Judges and attorneys which has exposed the Virginia State Bar had no authority to discipline attorneys. 

Since 1976, the VSB had no authority to prosecute or discipline attorneys as stated in Virginia Codes passed by the Virginia General Assembly. The VSB only has authority to investigate and report.

An important fact is that there are no "statute of limitations" for Ethics Complaints against attorneys.

The Virginia General Assembly established the State Agencies, Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission (JIRC) and Virginia State Bar to only investigate and report violations of Virginia Judicial Canons and Virginia Code of Professional Conduct committed by Virginia judges and lawyers to the appropriate Virginia courts.

As each Ethics Complaints are being heard, Judges are issuing orders which support Va. Code § 54.1-3915. simply stating that only the Virginia Courts have authority to discipline attorneys in Ethics Complaints.

The Virginia Attorney General's Office who is appointed to defend judicial officers in Ethics Complaints have not challenged Va. Code § 54.1-3915 and based their defense pleadings on Judicial Immunity.

Supreme Court of Virginia Rule 13-2 - Authority of the Courts

Nothing in this Paragraph shall be interpreted so as to eliminate, restrict or impair the jurisdiction of the courts of this Commonwealth to deal with the disciplining of Attorneys as provided by law. Every Judge shall have authority to take such action as may be necessary or appropriate to protect the interests of clients of any Attorney whose License is subject to a Suspension or Revocation. Every Circuit Court shall have power to enforce any order, summons or subpoena issued by the Board, a District Committee or Bar Counsel and to adjudge disobedience thereof as contempt.

JUDGES ETHICS COMPLAINTS

Virginia Code § 54.1-3915 reserves the authority to the courts to discipline to Virginia attorneys practicing law in Virginia, and all Virginia judges who must be licensed to practice law in Virginia.

Judges do not have judicial immunity, absolute immunity, sovereign immunity, or qualified immunity, or any immunities, for intentionally and maliciously engaging in alleged unethical conduct violating the Virginia Supreme Court Rules of Professional Conduct and Virginia Canons of Judicial Conduct.

Judges do not have judicial immunity, absolute immunity, sovereign immunity, or qualified immunity, or any other immunity for violating rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution.

Judges do not have judicial immunity, absolute immunity, sovereign immunity, or qualified immunity, or any other immunity for acting outside their jurisdiction.

§ 54.1-3915 Restrictions as to rules and regulations:
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this article, the Supreme Court shall not promulgate rules or regulations prescribing a code of ethics governing the professional conduct of attorneys which are inconsistent with any statute; nor shall it promulgate any rule or regulation or method of procedure which eliminates the jurisdiction of the courts to deal with the discipline of attorneys...

Virginia Circuit Courts have sole jurisdiction for civil Ethics Complaints alleging unethical conduct of attorneys under VA Code § 54.1-3915.

Va. Code § 54.1-3915 is the applicable Virginia statute in this case and sets out that the Supreme Court of Virginia shall not “promulgate any rule or regulation or method of procedure which eliminates the jurisdiction of the courts to deal with the discipline of attorneys...”.         

Va Code § 54.1-3915 provides no restrictions on who may file an ethics complaint against attorneys practicing law in Virginia. See Drewry, 161 Va. at 842, 172 S.E. at 286(Va 1934).

Based on VA Code § 54.1-3915 and all other applicable statutes, the Virginia State Bar does not have statutory authority to prosecute or discipline attorneys.

The Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board and District Committees members are not judicial officials appointed by the Virginia General Assembly to serve as judges, hearing officers, or any other type of judicial official.

Those interested can review VA Codes § 54.1-3915 and all Sections from § 54.1-3900 through § 54.1-3915, to verify this information.

In 1976, the VA Supreme Court and the VSB started the completely confidential VSB Disciplinary Board and Disciplinary System through only Virginia Supreme Court Rules and Regulations to take the cases in-house to hide the favors they were giving to the powerful lawyers practicing in Virginia.

Ethics Cases Currently Filed in Virginia Courts
  • U.S. District Court Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division Case 3:21-cv-00638
  • Henrico County Circuit Court CL21005758, CL21005759, CL21006572
  • Louisa County Circuit Court CL21000136, CL21000137, CL21000138, CL21000209, CL21000221, CL21000222
  • Orange County Circuit Court, CL21000427, CL21000704, CL21000851