RVA Judges and High Profile Lawyers Caught in Treason Plot against the Supreme Court of Virginia

Richmond Circuit Court Judge McClenney and Judge Balfour Conspired with Corrupt Lawyers to illegally create their own Court System without the Supreme Court's Authority.

Richmond Circuit Court Judge Jacqueline McClenney and retired Judge Daniel T. Balfour conspired together to usurp the authority of SCV Chief Justice Samuel Bernard Goodwyn by conducting a hearing without SCV Chief Justice Goodwyn designating retired Judge Daniel Balfour to preside over a hearing on July 24, 2023.

The SCV is investigating the reason why Judge Balfour presided over the hearing without Chief Justice Goodwyn signing an order designating him to preside over the case. Further investigation into why the Richmond Circuit Court Judges did not preside over the hearing and why proper procedures were not followed in accordance with Va. Code § 17.1-105. Designation of judges to hold courts and assist other judges.

Va Code § 17.1-105. Designation of judges states:

B. If all the judges of any court of record are so situated in respect to any case, civil or criminal, pending in their court as to render it improper, in their opinion, for them to preside at the trial, unless the cause or proceeding is removed, as provided by law, they shall enter the fact of record and the clerk of the court shall at once certify the same to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, who shall designate a judge of some other court of record or a retired judge of any such court to preside at the trial of such case.

Richmond Circuit Court Judicial Secretary Virginia Bray confirmed in emails that neither Judge McClenney nor the other Richmond Circuit Court judges signed an order recusing themselves. Court records indicate that no recusal order was signed and entered into the case file and that the SCV Chief Justice Goodwyn was never notified to designate a judge to preside over the case.

SCV and Richmond Court records show that Judge McClenney was scheduled to preside over the hearing but retired Judge Balfour just showed up in Court Room 307 and quickly presided over the hearing and illegally issued an order dismissing the controversial case and immediately left the court house.

On July 28, 2023, the Petitioner filed pleadings objecting to the illegal order which details evidence of Robert L. Freed and his counsel had conspired with Judge McClenney and Judge Balfour to violate Va. Code § 18.2-481. Treason, stating that the two judges and the opposing counsel; (1) Establishing, without authority of the legislature, any government within its limits separate from the existing government;(2) Holding or executing, in such usurped government, any office, or professing allegiance or fidelity to it; or (3) Resisting the execution of the laws under color of its authority.

The case (CL23-2683) involves several high profile lawyers who committed extrinsic fraud on the court and defrauded the Petitioner out of $100,000. The lawyers are listed as Robert L. Freed, Defendant, and his counsel Julie Palmer and Michael E. Harman of Harman Claytor Corrigan & Wellman, P.C.

Court records show that a serious conflict of interest was disclosed in emails to Judge McClenney and opposing counsel Julie Palmer and Mark Nanavati that their client Robert L. Freed has a long close personal relationship with Judge McClenney which was concealed from the Plaintiff and the Court.

Further Court records show that there was a serious conflict of interest between Judge McClenney and former Virginia Delegate George Manoli Loupassi, which a Letter of Recusal was sent to Judge McClenney on July 17, 2023 and a Motion to Recuse Judge McClenney was filed on July 21, 2023.

George Manoli Loupassi

In 2014, Richmond Delegate G. Manoli Loupassi, who chaired the House judicial selection subcommittee, endorsed and hard-pressed Judge McClenney’s appointment to the 13th Judicial Circuit. The highly controversial appointment of Judge McClenney and the removal of the Honourable Birdie Hairston Jamison created a media storm concerning how “anonymous” lawyers’ negative survey results about Judge Jamison’s policy of rejecting too many D.U.I. plea deals because of “high dollar lawyers” who represented DUI offenders.

                                             Honorable Birdie Hariston Jamison

The highly controversial removal of Judge Jamison and replacing her with Judge McClenney created a large media debate on why Judge McClenney was appointed to the 13th Judicial Circuit;

https://www.nbc12.com/story/30564637/richmond-traffic-judge-breaks-her-silence-talks-about-not-being-reappointed/

https://richmond.com/news/local/government-politics/ex-richmond-judge-defends-record-criticizes-judicial-re-election-process/article_14d5a4c2-1e13-526a-9c2d-33c7442f56fd.html

https://richmondfreepress.com/news/2014/dec/19/judge-defends-record/

https://richmondfreepress.com/news/2015/jan/22/general-assembly-ousts-jamison-welcomes-mcclenney/

https://www.facebook.com/NBC12News/videos/1105608196116947/

Judge McClenney’s allegiance to Loupassi and other high-profile defendants in Petitioner’s ethics complaint to vindicate exposing the existing criminal syndicate operating in the Virginia justice system. Furthermore, the appointment of Judge McClenney for the 13th Judicial Circuit was decided on who is a cooperative “player” in the judicial system, as alleged by the news media in the attached articles detailing the statements of the Honorable Jamison and other known political individuals. 

Loupassi and other high profile lawyers have ethics complaints filed in the Court Of Appeals and face having their law license suspended or revoked for operating a "white nationalism" syndicate where they protected affluent professionals involved in a 600- kilo cocaine organization that operated in Richmond for over ten years.

https://virginiastatebarcorruption.blogspot.com/2023/05/high-profile-richmond-attorneys-face.html

Thousands of Virginia Court orders could be null and void.

Thousands of Virginia Circuit Court Orders could be defective and illegal

A Circuit Court Deputy Clerk, who wished to remain anonymous, has disclosed that hundreds to thousands of court orders have not been recorded, have gone missing or the judge who signed them has not officially taken their oath as per the Virginia Code. The Circuit Court Clerk is not issuing a public statement in attempt to cover up the clerical errors which could overturn thousands of cases.

All defendants in Virginia who have had orders issued against them are urged to go to the Circuit Court Clerks Office to verify if court orders issued against them are recorded in the Circuit Clerks Order book. If the orders have not been recorded, the orders are illegal and can not be enforced.

They are also urged to verify if the Judge that signed their order had taken their oath before the Clerk of the Court of record and recorded. Numerous judges who had either been transferred to another jurisdiction or their term had been appointed, have failed to take their oath before the clerk, thus any order they have signed is null and void.

If the Circuit Court Clerk can not provide a record of either a court order being recorded or a judge that has issued an order, who has not taken their oath, then the affected party should contact their attorney or seek legal advise from legal services to have the order dismissed.

The Code of Virginia that address these issue are below with the links to view.

§ 17.1-123. How orders are recorded and signed.

A. All orders that make up each day's proceedings of every circuit court shall be recorded by the clerk in a book known as the order book. Orders that make up each day's proceedings that have been recorded in the order book shall be deemed the official record pursuant to § 8.01-389 when (i) the judge's signature is shown in the order, (ii) the judge's signature is shown in the order book, or (iii) an order is recorded in the order book on the last day of each term showing the signature of each judge presiding during the term.

B. If a judge dies, retires or resigns before orders recorded in the order book have been authenticated, the orders shall have the same force and effect and shall be deemed authenticated when the signature of another judge of the same circuit court or the signature of the judge appointed to fill the vacancy or to preside over the court until the vacancy is filled is authenticated as provided in subsection A.    Click to Code of Virginia Orders Recorded

§ 16.1-69.17. Oath of office of judges, clerks and others. . .

Every judge, substitute judge, clerk, deputy clerk, and juvenile and domestic relations probation officer of a juvenile and domestic relations district court shall, before entering upon the duties of his office, take the oath required by law. The oath of the judge and substitute judge shall be taken before a clerk of a court of record to which appeals from his court lie or any judge, and the oath of the clerk and other officers of the court shall be taken before the judge of the court he serves. Any oath taken before a judge or clerk prior to July 1, 1992, and otherwise conforming with this section is valid.

Click to Code of Virginia Oath of Office

Virginia Attorney E. Grier Ferguson, abusing the elderly and Financial Exploitation!

The "Good old boy" system is not so good!

There is a pending case (15-254) in the Suffolk Circuit Court which involves attorney E. Grier Ferguson as the former Fiduciary for Jones AIF estate and the current Fiduciary for the Jones Revocable Trust and one of the Jones' Estates. (Mary Margaret Jones and her son Francesco Bruno Bossio are the Beneficiaries.)

Mary Jones played for many years with the Richmond Symphony

The judges in the case are sitting Judge John F. Daffron Jr. (Chesterfield, retired) and Judge Randolph West as the Judicial Settlement Conference Judge. The local Judges refused to preside over this case for conflict of interest. The Suffolk Commonwealths Attorney is Carl Phillip Ferguson, brother of E. Grier Ferguson.

Ferguson, Rawls and Raines P.C.

Randolph Alexander Raines, Jr. (seated left), Frank M. Rawls (standing) and E. Grier Ferguson (seated right), 

The main issue in this case claims that E. Grier Ferguson, Fiduciary, committed Elder Abuse & Financial Exploitation.

http://www.napsa-now.org/get-informed/what-is-financial-exploitation/

Other alleged violations include:

1. Commingling clients' funds for 7+ years and alleged misappropriation of funds:

2. Excessive Fees ($450,000.00+): Legal, "maintenance" & advanced Fiduciary fees,  "real estate commission" paid from owner's personal funds & high real estate  commission paid to another client for "behind the back" sale of family property owned since 1711 at far below fair market value & no appraisal;

3. Federal tax fraud; 

4. Insurance fraud;

5. Postal and/or wire fraud;

6. Non-waivable conflicts of interests;

7. 10+ year's neglect of 2007 fire/water/toxic mold insurance claim;

8.  Failure to repair & maintain elderly's home & property;

9. Failing to re-mediate toxic mold in elderly's home, walls, cellar & crawl space;

10. Failure to purchase correct home/property insurance for 10+ years;

11. Paying insurance premiums for 10+ years for no coverage on home,  property or for                    liability coverage;

12.  Withholding or making late monthly allowance payments for living expenses;

13.  Allowing raw sewage to flood backyard, crawl spaces & bathrooms of tje Jones' Residence,        etc. without any actions to sanitize the flooded areas;

14. Incurable procedural defects in the Defendant's the case before it was consolidated with the        Plaintiff's case; 

15. The suspension by the Court of the Plaintiff's Subpoenas for the records of Mr. Ferguson,          Ferguson Rawls & Raines, PC, the corresponding bank records, even though the Court                stated on the Record at the last Hearing that the Plaintiff was entitled to have the Court              enforce, but the Court refused again to enforce for the Plaintiff;

16.  The ongoing breaches of Fiduciary Duties by Mr. Ferguson, including his attorneys'                     advising Mr. Ferguson that he should not correct any of the huge number of egregious                 Fiduciary Duties by their client, E. Grier Ferguson;

17.  The Defendant's daily abuse of the Beneficiaries by:

       a. Failing to repair the Jones' Residence to comply with Lloyds of London's current                          requirements before their insurance policy will cover any losses;

      b.  Failing to provide college tuition to Francesco Bruno-Bossio for the current university                 academic year;

      c.  Failing to provide any support to Francesco Bruno-Bossio;

      d. Failing to have the toxic mold throughout the Jones' Residence re-mediated for 10+ years            and failing to disclose the infestation of the toxic mold to Lloyd's of London;

     e.  Waste of valuable assets of the Jones' AIF estate, the Jones' Trust and the Jones' Estate #            1
     f.  Many other related and unrelated matters and issues;

18.  The immediate removal of E. Grier Ferguson as the Fiduciary and that he must be held               fully responsible financially to fully reimburse the Jones' Estate # 2 for all financial losses           to the Jones AIF estate, the Jones Revocable Trust and both Jones' Estates;  and/or his               attorneys to fully reimburse the Jones' Estate # 2 for all financial losses to the Jones AIF             estate, the Jones Revocable Trust and both Jones' Estates; 

19.  Numerous procedural and other issues directly involving Judge Daffron's conduct in these         consolidated case which has allowed the Defendant and his attorneys to drain the Jones'             assets and funds by $450,000.00+/- in legal fees and costs, plus the value of the Jones' assets         through mismanagement, waste, breaches of fiduciary duties, neglect, alleged                               misappropriation of Jones' funds, tax fraud, insurance fraud, physical damage to the                   Jones' Residence and the Jones' vehicle ; etc.


Incomplete financial disclosure received from E. Grier Ferguson from June 2006 through the date of the Judicial Settlement Conference on November 21, 2017, is a breach of fiduciary duty and harms the Beneficiaries.

This past week, the Suffolk Circuit Court Clerk refused to record the original revocation of the Jones Trust.

See below link for all documents to support the claims:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/vqcxsoj5oi4s5cp/AACC5GGtLmw4O-F0PcHvH1LCa?dl=0

Inside sources at the Suffolk Circuit Court have verified this information, but have chosen to remain anonymous. The sources stated that they are sickened by this type of "good old boy" cover up and that thus litigation is draining Mary Margaret Jones trust with such high legal fees going directly to E. Grier Ferguson and his attorneys and that this type of illegal behavior and abuse must be stopped!


Help stop the corruption by liking our page:
https://www.facebook.com/Virginiacorruptlawyers

Contact us at; vacorruptlawyers@gmail.com